Pin Down Your Portion Sizes with These Food Scales, Hand-Picked by RDs
A kitchen scale may not be the first thing you think of when you are considering essential kitchen equipment, but these scales are handy for a variety of reasons — from better baking to helping you accurately track your portion sizes. "Food scales are one of the most practical tools in the kitchen because they remove guesswork," explains Amanda Crowe, MS, RDN, INHC, dietitian and founder of Drive By Nutrition in Heber City, Utah. For cooking, baking, and food tracking, a food scale is vastly more accurate than measuring cups, measuring spoons, or other methods.
When choosing a food scale, it's important to look for one that works for your kitchen and your needs. For most people, choosing one that's easy to clean and use, with a generous weight capacity, is sufficient. We tried five kitchen scales and researched several others, and then chose the best options based on the tips that Crowe and Gradl provided. Here are the best food scales of 2026.
Our Top Picks for Food Scales
- Best High-Capacity Food Scale: Greater Goods High-Capacity Digital Food Scale
- Best Budget Food Scale: Amazon Basics Digital Kitchen Scale
- Best Bowl Style Food Scale: Smeg Digital Kitchen Scale
- Best Food Scale for Baking: OXO Good Grips 11-Pound Stainless Steel Kitchen Scale
- Best Food Scale for Counting Macros: Greater Goods Food Scale with Nutrition Calculator
- Best Rechargeable Food Scale: Letron Food Scale with Timer
- Easiest to Use Food Scale: Ozeri Pronto Digital Multifunction Kitchen and Food Scale
- Easiest to Clean Food Scale: KitchenAid 11lb Waterproof Digital Food Scale

Best High-Capacity Food Scale
Greater Goods High Capacity Digital Food Scale
Pros
- 22-pound weight capacity
- Easy to use
- Slim and easy to store
Cons
- Difficult to read when weighing large pots or bowls
- May be hard to clean under weighing surface
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 22 pounds
- Dimensions: 7.6 x 5.6 x 1.3 inches
- Power source: 3 AAA batteries
The Greater Goods High Capacity Digital Food Scale has a weight capacity of 22 pounds, significantly more than most home kitchen scales, which have a capacity of 8 to 11 pounds. This makes it an excellent choice for people who are weighing ingredients for full family meals or baked goods in large pots or bowls.
This scale is also very easy to use, and it feels well-made and very high-quality. It's sleek-looking and compact. I can easily store it in a drawer because it has such a small footprint and slim profile. One of the only complaints I have about this food scale is that, even though it has such a large weight capacity, it's so small that weighing in larger pots or bowls would make it very difficult to read the screen. While the surface wipes clean easily, the lip under the non-removable plate is difficult to fully clean.

Best Budget Food Scale
Amazon Basics Digital Kitchen Scale
Pros
- Under $15
- Easy to clean
- Wide weighing surface
Cons
- LCD display may be difficult to see
- May not be accurate with very small measurements
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 11 pounds
- Dimensions: 7 x 8.7 x 1.2 inches
- Power source: 2 AAA batteries
Coming in under $15, the Amazon Basics Digital Scale is an affordable option with some features that still make it a standout pick. First, it has a larger surface area for weighing than many more expensive food scales, so it's easier to weigh larger plates, bowls, or pans and still see the display. The plate is also easy to clean, with no grooves where food may get stuck.
It weighs up to 11 pounds and is small enough that you could find a home for it in even the most cramped kitchens. I appreciate how easy to use this food scale is, but I noticed some accuracy issues when measuring small amounts. I added salt a little bit at a time until the scale read two grams, but when I reweighed the entire amount at once, it was actually eight grams — which I verified with two other scales. The LCD display is not backlit and can be difficult to see because the numbers appear very light as well.

Best Bowl-Style Food Scale
Smeg Digital Kitchen Scale
Pros
- Modern aesthetic
- Bowl can be used to prep and weigh food
- USB rechargeable, requiring no batteries
Cons
- Bowl style can limit functionality
- Significantly more expensive than other food scales
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 11 pounds
- Dimensions: 8.75 x 10.5 x 12.4 inches
- Power source: USB rechargeable
The Smeg Digital Kitchen Scale is a unique food scale that features a removable bowl, allowing you to prep ingredients and weigh them in the same container. Smeg products are known for their distinct look. "If you're buying a Smeg appliance then you already know the price point is a reflection of the look," says health and nutrition writer Tori Martinet, MS, RD.
However, she also notes that the bowl style limits the scale's functionality. The scale can't be used to measure food on plates, in pots, or in other bowls. "It's a nice looking product and I can see using it for certain tasks," she says, "but I don't think it will replace my current, much more basic-looking but more precise scale." Another drawback is that this scale costs over $150, significantly more expensive than most other food scales.

Best Food Scale for Baking
OXO Good Grips 11-Pound Stainless Steel Kitchen Scale
Pros
- Pull-out display for larger bowls and containers
- Easy to clean
- Compact and easy to store
Cons
- Only weighs down to one-tenth of an ounce
- May be a delay when calculating weights
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 11 pounds
- Dimensions: 9.75 x 7 x 1.25 inches
- Power source: 4 AAA batteries
For baking projects that often require the use of large mixing bowls, a display that's easy to read is key. This OXO Good Grips scale features a pull-out display, allowing you to easily read the weights even when using a larger container to measure ingredients in. "I love the pull-out feature on this scale," says editor Katie Tuttle. "It's easy for a bowl to obscure your measurements when you're mixing dough, and OXO handles that quite neatly."
She also appreciates the scale's slim profile and easy-to-clean stainless steel surface. However, she notes that the food scale can only weigh down to one-tenth of an ounce, so it may not accurately measure very small quantities. She also says there can be a delay when the scale calculates weights.

Best Food Scale for Counting Macros
Greater Goods Food Scale with Nutrition Calculator
Pros
- Displays nutrition info based on food weight
- Affordable price point
- Measures down to 1 gram
Cons
- Doesn't connect to common food logging apps
- Requires entering codes to calculate nutrition info
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 11 pounds
- Dimensions: 9.31 x 6 x 0.88 inches
- Power source: 2 AAA batteries
While our team did not test this scale, I personally tried another Greater Goods food scale and was very impressed with the product quality, sleek design, and affordable price. However, it's unlikely that this scale will include all of the foods that you eat inside its database. It also doesn't connect to any common food logging apps, and it requires you to enter a code from a codebook to relay to the scale what food you are weighing. This can be time-consuming.

Best Rechargeable Food Scale
Letron Food Scale with Timer
Pros
- Can use USB or batteries
- Built-in timer
- 33-pound weight capacity
Cons
- Doesn't feel durable
- Difficult to see display when using a large bowl
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 33 pounds
- Dimensions: 5.9 x 8.85 x 1 inches
- Power source: USB or 2 AAA batteries
If you would like to avoid having to change batteries, a USB-rechargeable scale like this one from Letron is a good choice. It's versatile in that it can use battery power or you can charge it with the included USB cable. This food scale also has a very generous weight capacity of 33 pounds and a built-in timer. This makes it particularly useful for people who bake large quantities of bread at once, because bread-making often involves proofing and rising times.
However, according to our research, this product feels inexpensive and not durable. It is also prone to shutting off or resetting mid-use. With such a high weight capacity but a small surface area for weighing, I imagine the display's visibility when using a large mixing bowl would also be an issue.

Easiest to Use Food Scale
Ozeri Pronto Digital Multifunction Kitchen and Food Scale
Pros
- Removable, easy-clean weight plate
- Physical buttons
- Long-lasting
Cons
- More expensive than comparable food scales
- Plastic and feels less sturdy than some other scales
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 11.24 pounds
- Dimensions: 8.25 x 6 x 1.75 inches
- Power source: 2 AAA batteries
I've had my Ozeri Pronto kitchen scale for five years, and the reason it's been a mainstay is that it's so easy to use. It uses physical, tactile buttons that respond every time, even with wet hands — a nice contrast to the finicky touch controls on many glass-display models. The Ozeri display is a non-backlit LCD, but the numbers are dark enough that they are easily visible. The weight plate is also removable and easy to clean.
This kitchen scale weighs up to 11.24 pounds. However, I don't know that I would pay nearly $30 for this scale. It was around $15 when I purchased it, and when I bought mine there were several color options available (it appears to only be available in silver, now). It's plastic, and while it's performed well for me, I've also tested scales in that price range that seem much sturdier. Based on my experience with this kitchen scale, I would trust any of the kitchen scales from Ozeri.

Easiest to Clean Food Scale
KitchenAid 11lb. Waterproof Digital Food Scale
Pros
- Waterproof and completely flat for easy cleaning
- Stain-resistant glass surface
- Bright LED display
Cons
- May not be accurate for smaller quantities
- Buttons may not respond correctly when hands are wet
Key Specs
- Weight capacity: 11 pounds
- Dimensions: 7 x 9 x 0.98 inches
- Power source: 3 AAA batteries
For a food scale that's very easy to clean, look no further than this KitchenAid scale. It features a completely flat surface with digital buttons, and it's fully waterproof. It's easy to wipe down the entire scale without damaging the digital or electrical components. It can also be safely rinsed under running water.
The bright LED display ensures that the numbers are easy to read even in the shadow of a mixing bowl, and it is very slim, making it easy to store in nearly any kitchen. The glass surface is also stain-resistant, so it can stay looking nice enough to display on your counter if you desire. During our research, however, we noted that this scale may be less accurate when measuring smaller quantities. The completely flat, digital buttons may also not respond properly if your hands are wet or dirty.
Comparison Table
How We Chose and Tested the Best Food Scales

To choose the best food scales, we tested several models across different well-known and highly-rated brands. We also spoke with two registered dietitians:
We asked them what to look for in a good food scale. The most important things were a tare function (which lets you zero out the display once a container is placed on the scale, allowing you to measure the net contents), a variety of measurement units, and a generous weight capacity. Other important factors to consider are how easy it is to clean, how easy it is to see the readout even when measuring a large bowl or pot, and what power source the scale uses (batteries or USB, typically).
Additionally, I'm a registered dietitian myself, and I use a food scale almost daily, so I have a lot of practical experience using and evaluating food scales.
What To Look for When Buying Food Scales
All of the food scales we researched for this article could measure in numerous Imperial and metric units and featured a tare function, allowing the scale to be zeroed out to accommodate dishes or to weigh multiple foods and ingredients.
Here are a few other things that you might want to consider when choosing a food scale:
- Weight capacity: Most kitchen scales can weigh at least up to eight pounds. Gradl recommends choosing one with an 11-pound weight capacity at minimum. If you regularly weigh large batches of food or do a lot of baking, consider a high-capacity scale with a weight capacity of 20 pounds or more.
- Ease of cleaning: I know first-hand how dirty a food scale can get when you use it regularly, so choosing one that's easy to clean is important. The easiest models to clean are waterproof, have glass surfaces, and feature flat designs with integrated buttons.
- Power source: Most kitchen scales use batteries, but some are USB-rechargeable. Crowe and I both prefer battery-powered food scales, but USB-rechargeable scales may be less expensive over time because you won't need to replace the batteries. Note: some food scales use watch or coin batteries, which are more expensive and harder to find than other types. When it comes to battery-powered food scales, I prefer to stick to models that take AA or AAA batteries.
- Size: Kitchen food scales tend to be fairly small, especially the ones that are in the $50- or-less range. Some are significantly larger, like dual-platform models or scales with built-in bowls. If you regularly weigh large pots or bowls, consider a scale with a pull-out display or a larger base, so it's easier to see the readings.
What Are Food Scales Used For?
Food scales are handy in the kitchen for multiple reasons.
How Do You Properly Use a Food Scale?
To ensure that your food scale provides accurate readings, make sure it's on a flat surface.
Turn the power on and place your dish or bowl on the scale, then press the tare button to zero it out. Select the units you want your food weighed in, then place the food on the plate or in the bowl.
To weigh multiple ingredients or foods on a single plate, you can tare the scale between each item.
FAQs
Why Trust Everyday Health

SaVanna Shoemaker, MS, RDN, LD
Author
SaVanna Shoemaker is a registered dietitian and health writer. As a registered dietitian, SaVanna has worked with pregnant and postpartum women, infants and children, people with chronic kidney disease, and people who are critically ill. She is particularly interested in culinary and functional nutrition for weight loss and female hormone health.
She's currently a contributor for Everyday Health and Yahoo Life, and her work has also appeared in Forbes Vetted, Healthline, Greatist, mindbodygreen, and Bicycling magazine, among other outlets.
SaVanna lives with her husband and three kids in Little Rock, Arkansas. She enjoys cooking, reading, writing fiction, and weightlifting.

Julie Cunningham, MPH, RDN, LDN, CDCES
Medical Reviewer
Julie Cunningham is a registered dietitian-nutritionist and a certified diabetes care and education specialist.
Cunningham received a bachelor's degree from Appalachian State University in North Carolina. She subsequently completed a master's degree in public health nutrition at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Cunningham has worked in women's and children's health, cardiology, and diabetes. She has written for Abbott Nutrition News, Edgepark Medical HealthInsights, diaTribe, Babylist, and others. She is also the author of 30 Days to Tame Type 2 Diabetes.
A resident of beautiful western North Carolina, Cunningham is an avid reader who enjoys yoga, travel, and all things chocolate.

Orlando de Guzman
Fact-Checker
Orlando de Guzman is a writer and editor with expertise in health and environmental news. He has a background in investigative and science journalism and has worked on documentary films about war and trauma, health, sanitation, and the changing climate around the world. His interest in health and medicine started after an early career as a medical and legal translator.
De Guzman is a longtime health and fitness enthusiast who is interested in nutrition, diet, and mental health. He participates in endurance sports and cross-trains in several traditions of martial arts from Southeast Asia. De Guzman is interested in how the progressively complex movements of martial arts training can improve cognition and mental well-being, especially for those with PTSD and for those approaching middle age and beyond.
De Guzman has a dual B.A. in communications and international studies from the University of Washington in Seattle. He is committed to factual storytelling and evidence-based reporting on critical choices that affect our planet.

Katie Tuttle
Editor
Katie Tuttle is an editor and writer specializing in food, nutrition, and product testing. Her work has appeared in EatingWell, Food & Wine, The Spruce Eats, and Real Simple. She has written about meal kits, kitchen tools, fitness, and wellness, and has tested and reviewed a wide range of products, with a particular focus on meal delivery services and their impact on nutrition and convenience.
Beyond food, Katie has covered fitness and wellness topics, drawing from her own experience as a powerlifter and an occasional runner. She’s always interested in how products and services can make healthy living more accessible and practical.
When she’s not researching or writing, Katie is usually surrounded by houseplants or spending time with a foster dog. She firmly believes there’s no such thing as too many books or too much coffee.

Tori Martinet, MS, RD
Tester
Tori Martinet is an Intuitive Eating dietitian, food writer, recipe developer, and food photographer based in Southern California. She received a master's degree in nutrition from Columbia University Teachers College and spent nearly a decade as the director of wellness and sustainability for a premier food service contractor based in New York City. In her time there she crafted wellness and sustainability programming for clients like Google, Citigroup, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Harvard Business School, and the U.S. Open Tennis Tournament.
She has been a dietitian for nearly 10 years and currently works in private practice, dedicated to helping people pursue health without restriction and dieting. She also writes freelance food and nutrition content and has been featured in publications like Eating Well, Food & Wine, Shape, The Spruce Eats, U.S. News 360 Reviews, Verywell Health, and many more.

Katie Tuttle
Tester
Katie Tuttle is an editor and writer specializing in food, nutrition, and product testing. Her work has appeared in EatingWell, Food & Wine, The Spruce Eats, and Real Simple. She has written about meal kits, kitchen tools, fitness, and wellness, and has tested and reviewed a wide range of products, with a particular focus on meal delivery services and their impact on nutrition and convenience.
Beyond food, Katie has covered fitness and wellness topics, drawing from her own experience as a powerlifter and an occasional runner. She’s always interested in how products and services can make healthy living more accessible and practical.
When she’s not researching or writing, Katie is usually surrounded by houseplants or spending time with a foster dog. She firmly believes there’s no such thing as too many books or too much coffee.
- Dunn CG, et al. Dietary Self-Monitoring Through Calorie Tracking but Not Through a Digital Photography App Is Associated with Significant Weight Loss: The 2SMART Pilot Study-A 6-Month Randomized Trial. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. September 2019.
- Kim JY. Optimal Diet Strategies for Weight Loss and Weight Loss Maintenance. Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome. October 2020.
- Larson-Meyer DE, et al. Weight Gain Recommendations for Athletes and Military Personnel: a Critical Review of the Evidence. Current Nutrition Reports. June 2022.
- Partridge EK, et al. Comparison of Nutrient Estimates Based on Food Volume versus Weight: Implications for Dietary Assessment Methods. Nutrients. July 27, 2018.
- Xu R, et al. How much food tracking during a digital weight-management program is enough to produce clinically significant weight loss? Obesity. July 2023.
- Bucher T, et al. The international food unit: a new measurement aid that can improve portion size estimation. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. September 2017.
- Metric Kitchen: Culinary Measurement Tips Author: Office of Weights and Measures. National Institute of Standards and Technology. May 2025.