The Risks of Untreated Crohn’s Disease vs. Biologics Side Effects

Balancing the Risks of Uncontrolled Crohn’s vs. Biologics

Balancing the Risks of Uncontrolled Crohn’s vs. Biologics
iStock; Everyday Health

For many people newly diagnosed with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease, the idea of starting a biologic medication can feel intimidating.

Drug labels often include a long list of potential side effects, including rare infections or cancer risks. And research suggests that many people perceive advanced treatments to be riskier than other therapies.

But gastroenterologists often frame the decision differently with their patients: It isn’t simply about whether biologics carry risks. It’s about comparing those risks to the long-term consequences of having Crohn’s disease that isn’t well controlled.

In modern inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care, experts say that the danger of ongoing, uncontrolled inflammation that can lead to irreversible gut damage usually outweighs the relatively rare risks associated with targeted biologic therapies.

What Uncontrolled Inflammation Does

Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that can progressively damage the digestive tract if inflammation remains active. This is why disease management is about early, sustained control of inflammation, not just symptom relief, according to Alan Moss, MD, the chief scientific officer at the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and a professor of gastroenterology at Boston University's Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine.

“When Crohn’s inflammation smolders for months or years, the bowel wall tries to heal by laying down scar tissue. Over time that scarring can turn a soft, inflamed segment into a stiff, narrowed segment we call a fibrotic stricture,” says Dr. Moss.

If inflammation penetrates deeper into the intestinal wall, other complications can develop.

“If inflammation keeps breaking through the bowel wall instead of healing, it can tunnel to nearby loops of intestine, the skin, or other organs, forming fistulas and sometimes pockets of pus called abscesses,” he says.

These complications can occur within the first few years in people whose Crohn’s isn’t well controlled, Moss says, pointing to long-term data suggesting that more than half of people with Crohn’s will eventually develop strictures, fistulas, or abscesses if inflammation is not effectively treated.

 Perianal fistulas alone occur in roughly one-third of people with Crohn’s over the course of their illness.

In Crohn’s, bowel damage tends to be cumulative over time, and once scar tissue and strictures occur, much of that structural change is “effectively irreversible,” says Moss.

Unchecked inflammation can also lead to complications beyond the intestines. In people with severe Crohn’s disease, symptoms can include malnutrition and anemia. And it can raise the risk of colon cancer and inflammatory problems affecting the joints, skin, eyes, liver, and kidneys.

Biologics for Targeted Crohn’s Treatment

Biologic medications, or biologics, have joined other classes of medications that are a core part of modern Crohn’s disease care. From 2011 to 2020, the share of people with Crohn’s disease who were prescribed biologics rose from 1 in 8 to 1 in 3.

Biologics are lab-created medicines made from living cells that are designed to target certain parts of the immune system involved in inflammation.

 These drugs work by blocking specific inflammatory pathways, allowing doctors to treat a range of autoimmune diseases more precisely, rather than suppressing the immune system broadly.

That precision marks a shift from older Crohn’s treatments, such as corticosteroids like prednisone, which reduce inflammation throughout the entire body, says Anish Sheth, MD, a gastroenterologist and co-director of the Center for Digestive Health at Penn Medicine Princeton Health in Plainsboro, New Jersey. “Biologics are antibody-based treatments to control, in this case, inflammation,” Dr. Sheth says. “They’re newer drugs targeting receptors and molecules that we call gut specific. They’re exerting their effect in very limited places.”

According to recent guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association, they’re considered the “most effective drugs” for the management of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease, and they should be introduced earlier during treatment, rather than delaying until other medications fail. In the past, treatment often followed a step-up strategy — starting with milder drugs and escalating only if symptoms worsened.

“We’ve known for 15 years or more that’s not the right approach,” Sheth says. “What happens is that you let the disease go on for years before you finally get it under control.”

A review published in 2023 considered biologics and their safety profiles from 13 clinical trials; it found that biologics “can be considered an effective and safe option” for moderate to severe Crohn’s treatment.

Putting the Risks in Perspective

From worries around the potential for serious infection to a heightened risk of cancer, researchers suggest that people with Crohn’s disease have hesitations about biologics.

 But gastroenterologists say that the decision to try biologic therapy is best understood by comparing two risks side by side: the potential side effects of treatment and the well-documented complications of uncontrolled inflammation.

“When patients read biologic labels, the words that can stand out are ‘serious infection,’ ‘lymphoma,’ and ‘other cancers,’ and that fear is completely understandable,” Moss says. “The reassuring piece is that, in large studies, those complications are uncommon.”

The chance of a serious infection is on the order of a few people out of 100 each year, and the added risk of lymphoma is just a few extra cases per 10,000 people per year.

By comparison, Crohn’s is a progressive disease that gets worse without effective treatment. Historically, more than 70 percent of people with Crohn’s have needed bowel surgery within 10 years of being diagnosed.

 Since biologic use became common, that’s dropped to an estimated 26 percent.

“Biologics can feel like heavy medications, but doing nothing also carries serious risks, including ongoing inflammation, hospitalizations, and potential surgery, so we need to compare those risks side by side for your specific situation,” Moss says.

When assessing risk with his patients, he reminds them of these points:

  • For many people, biologics actually lower long-term complications and improve quality of life by controlling inflammation early and effectively.
  • Your healthcare team will monitor you closely to minimize and manage side effects.
  • The medical community’s comfort level with using biologics is much higher than it was in the past, and it now has over 20 years’ experience with this class of drug.

Anti-TNFs vs. IL-12/23 Inhibitors: A Side Effect Comparison

Several classes of biologic drugs are used to treat Crohn’s disease. They all work to reduce inflammation, but they target different parts of the immune system and have slightly different safety profiles.

Anti-TNF Drugs

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs were the first biologics widely used for Crohn’s disease and have more than 20 years of clinical experience behind them.

“These drugs have the longest track record and work very well for many patients,” Moss says.

But because anti-TNFs suppress immune activity more broadly throughout the body, they may carry a somewhat higher risk of infections.

“For many of my patients, I frame it this way: The older anti-TNF drugs like Remicade and Humira have the longest track record and work well, but they do carry a somewhat higher risk of serious infections, especially when combined with other immune-suppressing medicines,” Moss says.

Anti-TNFs are still commonly used today, particularly for people with fistulizing Crohn’s disease, those who are pregnant, and patients with inflammatory symptoms outside the digestive tract, such as arthritis or skin conditions, Sheth says.

IL-12/23 and IL-23 Inhibitors

Newer biologics, including IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors, target more specific immune pathways involved in Crohn’s disease.

“With newer IL-23 inhibitors like Stelara and Skyrizi, large trials and real-world studies suggest [that there are] fewer serious infections and fewer issues with antibodies,” Moss says. “That means people are often able to stay on them longer without needing to stop or switch.”

Because these medications act more selectively on the immune system, many specialists describe them as having a more gut-focused effect, which may help reduce systemic side effects compared with earlier biologic therapies.

As far as effectiveness, a study published in 2022 compared the TNF inhibitor adalimumab and the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab and found both biologics equally effective, with comparable rates of remission.

How Your Doctor Mitigates Risk

Doctors take several steps to minimize potential complications before and during biologic therapy, according to Moss:

  • Before starting treatment, patients typically undergo comprehensive screening tests to identify conditions that could increase the risk of infection. These often include blood tests, chest X-rays, and a vaccine review to identify and treat silent infections (like tuberculosis and hepatitis).
  • During treatment, doctors focus on therapeutic drug monitoring (regular checks of blood work, drug levels, and antibodies) to guide them in maintaining a patient’s sweet spot, so they’re less likely to lose response, have a flare, or run into preventable side effects.

Beyond tests, your doctor will also follow safety protocols, such as avoiding unnecessary combinations of immune-suppressing drugs and ensuring you stay up to date on vaccinations, Moss says. If necessary, they will adjust your treatment plan.

When Sheth works with his patients, he shares statistics pointing to strong safety data and offers patients a trial period.

“I’ll tell them, 'Try it for three to six months and see what it does for your diarrhea, abdominal pain, energy, and quality of life.' If the benefits aren’t enough or they have side effects, we can stop it,” he says. “But most patients end up saying they feel better than they have in years and don’t want to come off.”

These strategies have helped make biologic therapy safer and more predictable than ever before.

The Takeaway

  • Untreated Crohn’s disease can cause progressive inflammation that leads to complications such as strictures, fistulas, infections, and bowel damage over time.
  • Biologic medications, or biologics, are lab-made therapies designed to target specific immune pathways driving inflammation, rather than suppressing the entire immune system.
  • While biologics carry some risks, serious side effects are relatively rare compared with the long-term complications associated with uncontrolled Crohn’s disease.
  • Working closely with a gastroenterologist, including undergoing recommended screenings and monitoring, can help reduce risks and improve treatment outcomes.

Resources We Trust

EDITORIAL SOURCES
Everyday Health follows strict sourcing guidelines to ensure the accuracy of its content, outlined in our editorial policy. We use only trustworthy sources, including peer-reviewed studies, board-certified medical experts, patients with lived experience, and information from top institutions.
Resources
  1. Koliani-Pace JL et al. Patients' Perceive Biologics to Be Riskier and More Dreadful Than Other IBD Medications. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. January 2020.
  2. Thia KT et al. Risk Factors Associated With Progression to Intestinal Complications of Crohn's Disease in a Population-Based Cohort. Gastroenterology. January 14, 2010.
  3. Adegbola SO et al. Current Review of the Management of Fistulising Perianal Crohn’s Disease. Frontline Gastroenterology. August 13, 2020.
  4. Crohn’s Disease. Mayo Clinic. December 4, 2025.
  5. Xu F et al. Trends and Demographic Patterns in Biologic and Corticosteroid Prescriptions for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Findings From Electronic Medical Records, 2011–2020. Journal of Investigative Medicine. September 5, 2022.
  6. Medication Options for Crohn’s Disease. Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.
  7. Biologics (Biologic Medicine). Cleveland Clinic. August 9, 2024.
  8. AGA recommends early use of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. American Gastroenterological Association. May 27, 2021.
  9. Feuerstein JD et al. AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Medical Management of Moderate to Severe Luminal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology. June 2021.
  10. Avedillo-Salas A et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Biologic Drugs in the Treatment of Moderate–Severe Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals. November 2023.
  11. Holmer A et al. Overall and Comparative Safety of Biologic and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. July 25, 2019.
  12. De Buck van Overstraeten A et al. Surgery for Crohn’s Disease in the Era of Biologicals: A Reduced Need or Delayed Verdict? World Journal of Gastroenterology. August 7, 2012.
  13. Tsai L et al. Contemporary Risk of Surgery in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Cohorts. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. October 27, 2020.
  14. Zeng Z et al. Anti-TNFα in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Originators to Biosimilars. Frontiers in Pharmacology. July 23, 2024.
  15. Sands BE et al. Ustekinumab Versus Adalimumab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 3b Trial. The Lancet. June 11, 2022.

Yuying Luo, MD

Medical Reviewer

Yuying Luo, MD, is an assistant professor of medicine at Mount Sinai West and Morningside in New York City. She aims to deliver evidence-based, patient-centered, and holistic care for her patients.

Her clinical and research focus includes patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction such as irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia; patients with lower gastrointestinal motility (constipation) disorders and defecatory and anorectal disorders (such as dyssynergic defecation); and women’s gastrointestinal health.

She graduated from Harvard with a bachelor's degree in molecular and cellular biology and received her MD from the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. She completed her residency in internal medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, where she was also chief resident. She completed her gastroenterology fellowship at Mount Sinai Hospital and was also chief fellow.

carmen-chai-bio

Carmen Chai

Author

Carmen Chai is a Canadian journalist and award-winning health reporter. Her interests include emerging medical research, exercise, nutrition, mental health, and maternal and pediatric health. She has covered global healthcare issues, including outbreaks of the Ebola and Zika viruses, anti-vaccination movements, and chronic diseases like obesity and Alzheimer’s.

Chai was a national health reporter at Global News in Toronto for 5 years, where she won multiple awards, including the Canadian Medical Association award for health reporting. Her work has also appeared in the Toronto Star, Vancouver Province, and the National Post. She received a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Ryerson University in Toronto.