Breast Implants After Mastectomy: Which Are Best?

What’s the Best Breast Implant After Mastectomy?

What’s the Best Breast Implant After Mastectomy?
Adobe Stock

For many women, a mastectomy can be one of the hardest parts of their breast cancer journey.

“Along with the physical recovery, women are often coping with changes in body image, confidence, and a sense of identity,” says Jennifer Tseng, MD, the medical director of breast surgery at City of Hope Orange County in Irvine, California. Breasts are linked to a woman’s femininity, sexuality, or identity as a mother — so losing one or both breasts can, for some women, be a profound loss.

“Those emotions are every bit as real as the physical healing,” says Dr. Tseng, “and deserve the same attention and support.”

That’s why many women opt for breast reconstruction after a mastectomy. Today, there are more options than ever before — but what works for one woman might not work for another. “I often remind patients that reconstruction is … about finding the option that's right for them,” says Dr. Tseng.

Whether you choose breast reconstruction with your own tissue or opt for implants, or decide you want to “go flat,” the decision should align with your priorities. Here’s a closer look at your options.

Saline vs. Silicone Gel Implants

Most implants that are used for breast reconstruction have either a saline or silicone filling (both have an outer silicone shell). Each type of implant has its potential benefits and drawbacks.

Saline Implants

Saline implants consist of a silicone outer shell that's filled with sterile saltwater.

One of the major benefits is that they can require a slightly smaller incision than silicone implants, Tseng says.

Like all implants, though, saline implants can cause capsular contracture (a condition in which scar tissue accumulates around the implant and tightens, changing the shape of the implant) or result in a tear or leak. In that case, surgery is sometimes needed to remove or replace the implant.

If a saline implant tears or leaks, another benefit is that “saline is safely absorbed by the body,” says Danielle H. Rochlin, MD, MPH, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. It’s also fairly easy to detect a rupture without imaging, she says, since the breast changes shape when the implant deflates.

The primary disadvantages of saline implants relate to appearance and feel. “Saline implants tend to feel less natural than silicone implants,” says Dr. Rochin. They’re also more likely to produce rippling — that is, wrinkling of the implant’s outer shell can be visible through the skin, particularly in thinner women, she says.

Saline Implants Pros and Cons

Pros
Cons
Rupture is easy to identify
Feel less natural
Saline is safely absorbed by the body in case of rupture
More likely to produce rippling
May be placed with a slightly smaller incision than silicone implants
Risk of complications, including capsular contracture and tearing

Silicone Implants

Silicone implants consist of an outer silicone shell and an inner, cohesive silicone gel.

“Overall, they tend to feel more like natural breast tissue compared to saline implants,” Rochlin says. They also tend to produce less visible rippling.

The main tradeoff is that a rupture may not cause noticeable changes to the breast, and therefore, may go undetected, Tseng says.

While a leak from a silicone implant isn’t thought to cause health problems, the torn implant may cause breast pain, thickening, or changes in shape. The leaked silicone can also travel to other regions of the body,

which is one reason why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends people with silicone implants undergo periodic imaging with MRI or ultrasound.

Along with tears or leaks, silicone implants can also cause capsular contracture.

Silicone Implants Pros and Cons

Pros
Cons
Feel more like natural breast tissues
Difficult to detect rupture
Less visible rippling
Periodic imaging required
Risk of complications, including infection, capsular contracture, and tearing

The Polyurethane-Coated Silicone Gel Implant

Polyurethane-coated silicone gel implants consist of a silicone gel implant covered by a thin layer of polyurethane foam. These types of implants are not FDA-approved and were taken off the market in 1991 due to toxicity concerns.

But they’re available in many other regions of the world, including Europe and the United Kingdom.

“These implants consist of a silicone gel implant covered by a thin layer of polyurethane foam,” Rochlin says. “The coating encourages scar tissue to grow into the surface in a less organized pattern, which may reduce the likelihood of capsular contracture and help stabilize the position of the implant.” Research also shows that women who receive polyurethane-coated silicone gel implants are less likely to experience capsular contracture than women who receive standard implants.

Rochlin notes that polyurethane represents a highly textured implant surface, which raises concerns regarding a rare type of lymphoma that develops in the scar tissue surrounding an implant. “In addition, tissue grows into the polyurethane surface, which can make subsequent implant removal more difficult,” she says.

If polyurethane-coated silicone gel implants are available where you live, your reconstructive surgeon can explain whether they offer any advantages in your particular situation, Tseng says.

Which Breast Implant Is the Best Choice?

While many women often want to know which implant is “best,” Tseng tells her patients there is no single answer. “The best implant is the one that best fits your anatomy, cancer treatment plan, lifestyle, and personal preferences,” she says.

Your breast size and shape, aesthetic goals, and willingness to undergo surgery and future imaging are all aspects to consider before making a choice, Rochlin says.

One caveat: If you’re receiving radiation therapy, you may want to hold off on undergoing reconstruction, at least temporarily.

“Radiated tissue generally heals less reliably and becomes firmer over time,” Rochlin says. “As a result, women who have received radiation have a higher risk of complications with implant reconstruction, including capsular contracture, healing problems, and implant loss.”

It may also affect the final appearance of the reconstructed breast, she notes.

This doesn't mean implants aren't an option, but radiation can influence the timing and type of reconstruction that's recommended, Tseng says. That’s why she advises meeting with a reconstructive plastic surgeon before your mastectomy whenever possible. “Understanding your options early gives you time to ask questions, consider what matters most to you, and make a decision with confidence,” she says.

Don’t Want Breast Implants? You Have Other Options

Implants aren’t your only option post-mastectomy. Here are some other procedures.

  • Tissue Flap Reconstruction This surgery involves using tissue from other areas of your body, such as the back, belly, thighs, or buttocks, to rebuild your breasts.

  • Aesthetic Flat Closure This procedure is the gold-standard if you would like to go flat. It involves removing excess skin, fat, and tissue and carefully contouring the chest so that the skin lies as smoothly and evenly as possible after a mastectomy.

  • External Breast Prosthesis You can opt to use an external artificial breast, which can be worn against your skin or fit into a bra cup (called a mastectomy bra) to replace your natural breast.

“Each is a valid choice,” Tseng says. “The goal isn't for every woman to make the same decision. It's for every woman to understand her options, feel supported by her care team, and choose the approach that's right for her.”

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Deciding on breast reconstruction after a mastectomy can feel overwhelming, so it’s important to fully understand your options. Tseng recommends asking the following questions when meeting with your surgeon.

  • Am I a candidate for both implant and tissue-based reconstruction?
  • How might radiation affect my options?
  • What results can I realistically expect?
  • What are the potential risks and complications?
  • How long will recovery take?
  • Will I likely need additional procedures in the future?
  • Based on my situation, what would you recommend, and why?

“The most important question is the one that's on your mind,” Tseng says. “I want every patient to leave that conversation knowing she understands her options and that we've made the decision together.”

Resources We Trust

EDITORIAL SOURCES
Everyday Health follows strict sourcing guidelines to ensure the accuracy of its content, outlined in our editorial policy. We use only trustworthy sources, including peer-reviewed studies, board-certified medical experts, patients with lived experience, and information from top institutions.
Resources
  1. Pan AM et al. Impact of Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life Among Women After Mastectomy. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. December 15, 2025.
  2. Breast Implants: Saline vs Silicone. Mayo Clinic. June 14, 2024.
  3. Breast Reconstruction Using Implants. American Cancer Society. July 1, 2026.
  4. Breast Implants - Certain Labeling Recommendations to Improve Patient Communication. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. September 29, 2020.
  5. Siliprandi M et al. Polyurethane-Coated Silicone Breast Implants: A Viable Option for Primary Augmentation Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review and Technical Considerations. JPRAS Open. June 2025.
  6. Mitevova D et al. Breast Implants Throughout Time. When Breast Implants Became Safer. Bratislava Medical Journal. September 30, 2025.
  7. Breast Reconstruction Using Polyurethane-Coated Implants Reduces Scarring and the Need for Further Surgery. European Breast Cancer Conference. March 25–27, 2026.
  8. Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy. National Cancer Institute. December 2, 2025.
  9. Breast Reconstruction Using Your Own Tissue (Flap Procedures). American Cancer Society. July 1, 2026.
  10. About Aesthetic Flat Closure. BreastCancer.org. June 12, 2026.
  11. Post-Mastectomy Prosthesis. Johns Hopkins.
ryland-gore-bio

Ryland J. Gore, MD, MPH

Medical Reviewer
Ryland Gore, MD, MPH, is a board-certified, fellowship-trained surgeon specializing in breast surgical oncology in Atlanta. She completed her general surgery residency at Rush Univ...

Ashley Welch

Author

Ashley Welch has more than a decade of experience in both breaking news and long-form storytelling. She is passionate about getting to the crux of the latest scientific studies and...